 |
|
Comparative study of glenoid version and inclination using two-dimensional images from computed tomography
and three-dimensional reconstructed bone models
Chang-Hyuk Choi, Hee-Chan Kim, Daewon Kang, Jun-Young Kim
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2020;23(3):119-124. Published online 2020 Sep 1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2020.00220
|
|
Citations to this article as recorded by
 Assessment of a novel computed tomography ratio to characterize B2 glenoid morphology with total shoulder arthroplasty
Sameer R. Oak, Jeffrey L. Horinek, Laurel A. Barras, Bruce S. Miller, Brian C. Werner, Patrick J. Denard, Asheesh Bedi
Seminars in Arthroplasty: JSES.2024; 34(1): 252. CrossRef Femoral head allograft for glenoid bone loss in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: functional and radiologic outcomes
Roberto Castricini, Michele Mercurio, Olimpio Galasso, Valentina Sanzo, Marco De Gori, Massimo De Benedetto, Nicola Orlando, Giorgio Gasparini
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery.2024; 33(2): e58. CrossRef Variability and reliability of 2-dimensional vs. 3-dimensional glenoid version measurements with 3-dimensional preoperative planning software
Jared J. Reid, Bryce F. Kunkle, Alex T. Greene, Josef K. Eichinger, Richard J. Friedman
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery.2022; 31(2): 302. CrossRef Long-term outcomes after humeral head replacement and total shoulder replacement for osteonecrosis of the humeral head: a mean follow-up of 8 years
Sung-Min Rhee, Du-Han Kim, Yong Girl Rhee, Chul-Hyun Cho
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.2022; 143(8): 4597. CrossRef
|