Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) originates from the epithelium of the proximal convoluted renal tubules. RCC has a propensity for metastasis, and the frequency of spread varies: 60%–75% spread to the lungs, 60%–65% to the regional lymph nodes, 39%–40% to the liver, 20%–35% to the bones, and 5%–7% to the brain [
1]. Even though more than 60% of RCC patients develop various metastases during the course of their disease, not many reports describe metastasis around orthopedic implants. Here, we present a case of RCC that metastasized to the proximal humerus in a patient who had undergone repair of a torn rotator cuff using suture anchors 6 years prior. She was successfully treated with metastasectomy with cementation and internal fixation. We discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic perspectives and briefly review the relevant literature.
CASE REPORT
The approval of the Institutional Review Board of Konkuk University Medical Center (IRB No. 2020-09-025) was obtained and, informed consent for this retrospective study was waived by the Board.
A 78-year-old female was referred for pain and pseudoparesis of the right shoulder along with a firm, bulging mass. Six years previous, she had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) for a painful and large rotator cuff tear using crossFT (Conmed, Utica, NY, USA) suture anchors at the medial footprint and SwiveLock SP (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) anchors at the lateral humeral cortex. The crossFT anchor was composed of polyether ether ketone materials, and the SwiveLock SP anchor had a titanium tip. The patient’s symptoms improved after RCR, and postoperative images showed well-maintained continuity and thickness of the repaired tendon. Two weeks after RCR, a 7.9-cm-sized heterogeneous mass was detected in the upper pole of the left kidney, and she underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy one week later. The final diagnosis was grade 3 clear cell RCC.
About 75 months after RCR, a simple X-ray showed an expansile lytic bone lesion with an ill-defined border and a broad zone of transition in the right proximal humerus around anchor implants (
Fig. 1A and
B). Magnetic resonance imaging showed a T2-hyperintense and T1-hypointense, 4.3×4;3.5×4.3-cm-sized, poorly circumscribed, cortical-destructive lesion with peri-osseous mass formation (
Fig. 1C and
D). The findings suggested metastasis, and infection or anchor foreign body reactions were unlikely. Collaborating with colleagues in the Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology, we planned the patient’s postoperative treatment, such as palliative radiotherapy or systemic chemotherapy. A whole-body bone scan to identify additional metastatic lesions prior to surgery demonstrated foci, suggesting the possibility of bone metastases in the left ischium, lateral condyle of the left femur, and distal shaft of the right femur in addition to the primary focus (
Fig. 1E). Because the patient did not report additional symptoms that correlated with the scan result, further evaluation was not performed.
For treatment of this metastatic lesion, she underwent metastasectomy without preoperative embolization and internal fixation with cement augmentation. During the metastasectomy, an exophytic highly vascular mass with several feeding arteries surrounded by lateral anchors was found and removed. After surgery, only a friable medial cortex remained, and the distal humerus was impacted into the humeral head. Therefore, plate (PHILOS; DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, USA) fixation with cement augmentation was performed to increase stability (
Fig. 2A-D). Histopathology confirmed that the lesion was metastatic clear cell RCC (
Fig. 3).
The patient’s postoperative course was uneventful. One month after surgery, she started Votrient (pazopanib) chemotherapy, resulting in symptomatic improvement in her right shoulder. Two months after surgery, she could dress herself, and the range of motion improved, with 70° of active elevation, active deltoid muscle contracture. A postoperative chest radiograph demonstrated no evidence of fixation loss or recurrence (
Fig. 2E).
DISCUSSION
RCC is classified into clear cell, papillary, chromophobe, multilocular cystic, collecting duct, medullary, and unclassified types according to histology. The clear cell type is most frequently reported. Bone metastasis, observed in one-third of patients with RCC, has a higher incidence in patients with clear cell type RCC [
1]. Resection of the metastases followed by local and systemic therapies is reported to improve prognosis. Surgical excision, however, can be difficult because metastases tend to be large, progressive, highly destructive, hypervascularized, and associated with a soft-tissue mass.
Only a few studies have previously reported metastasis around orthopedic implants, and most of these reports were confined to implants of total arthroplasty or plates [
2,
3]. The reported cases of metastasis around orthopedic implants have originated from non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma, immunoblastic lymphoma, carcinomas of the lung, gastric carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, RCC, hepatocellular carcinoma, and prostate cancer [
2-
4]. Although various cancers have been reported, no definite common denominator exists among cases of metastasis. Most metastatic lesions, however, showed periprosthetic osteolysis around the metal implants. Although we do not know the exact mechanism of metastasis around implants (or whether there is a cause-and-effect relationship), we believe that dissemination of cancer cells via blood vessels to tissues weakened by surgical trauma can affect the course of metastasis, and more cancer cells can accumulate on implants, which are foreign bodies [
5].
Regarding RCC metastases to orthopedic implants, three case reports described metastases around total hip arthroplasty implants [
6-
8]. Two occurred around femoral implants [
6,
8], and one occurred around an acetabular implant [
7]. All three cases showed loosening of the implants by metastatic infiltration. Two cases [
7,
8] were treated by revision arthroplasty, and one case [
6] utilized open biopsy of the femoral bone for diagnosis followed by palliative treatment.
No previous reports documented metastasis around a suture anchor inserted in bone. RCC is a highly vascularized tumor with extensive, thin-walled, sinusoid-like vessels, producing areas with a rich blood supply (such as the vertebrate or pelvis) prone to metastasis. We believe this feature of blood-born RCC metastasis can cause cancer cells to spread around the suture anchor at a site of surgical trauma. Several authors have postulated that abnormal blood flow increases due to surgical insult and the healing response, and this increased blood flow can create a predilection for metastases. In addition, a hematoma formed during RCR could be a hotbed for cancer cell seeding [
9]. Furthermore, the suture anchor implant is a foreign body inside a bone, which can cause a foreign body reaction, such as activation of macrophages, giant cells, and leukocytes [
10]. This foreign body reaction can facilitate the growth of blood-borne tumors, as suggested by Murphy et al. [
5] However, these explanations for increased susceptibility to metastasis around implants are only hypotheses and are not fully understood; thus, they warrant further study. We believe our case demonstrates the vulnerability of suture anchor implant after RCR to increase susceptibility to tumor metastasis.
This is the first report documenting a case of RCC metastasis around a suture anchor implant after RCR. Clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion and consider the possibility of metastases around orthopedic implants in patients with malignancies of various origins.