Clin Shoulder Elb Search

CLOSE


Clin Shoulder Elb > Volume 26(2); 2023 > Article
Fallah, Baghianimoghadam, Baghbani, and Karim: Type IV Monteggia-equivalent fracture in an adult: a case report

Abstract

A Monteggia fracture is a proximal ulnar fracture with proximal radioulnar ligamentous instability. While there is no precise definition, Monteggia-equivalent fractures are generally considered Monteggia fractures accompanied by radial head fractures. These are rare. In this study, we report a rare variation of a Bado type IV Monteggia-equivalent lesion (fracture of proximal ulnar shaft, proximal radial shaft, and radial head) and its management.

Level of evidence

V.

A Monteggia fracture is a fracture of the proximal ulna with proximal radioulnar ligamentous instability that leads to radial head dislocation [1-3]. In 1967, Bado [1] divided Monteggia fractures into four types based on direction of radial head dislocation and ulnar fracture angulation. A type I Bado fracture is a proximal ulnar anterior apex fracture with anterior dislocation of the radial head and is the most common type in children. A type II Bado fracture is a proximal ulnar anterior apex fracture with posterior dislocation of the radial head and is the most common type in adults. A type III Bado fracture is an ulnar metaphyseal fracture with lateral or anterolateral radial head dislocation, and a type IV Bado fracture is a fracture of both forearm bones that is accompanied by anterior dislocation of the radial head.
However, over the years, other injuries such as radial head fracture, coronoid fracture, or concomitant coronoid and radial head injuries have added complexities to the classification of Monteggia-related lesions [4]. As a result, the term Monteggia fracture includes various forms of complex fracture dislocations of the proximal ulna and radius; these have not yet been fully categorized. In this study, we report a rare variation of a Monteggia-like lesion and its management.

CASE REPORT

This study was approved by Institutional Review Board of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Written consent for the study and publication of the photographs was obtained from the patient. The patient is a 24-year-old man who suffered from pain, swelling, and limited forearm and elbow movement following a motorcycle to car accident and who was referred to our trauma center emergency ward. Physical examination of the patient showed no symptoms of neurovascular disorders or of compartment syndrome. After initial supportive measures, radiographs of the elbow and forearm were obtained. Radiographs and computed tomography scan showed proximal and distal (segmental) fractures of the ulnar shaft, a proximal radial shaft fracture, and a comminuted radial head fracture (Fig. 1). Based on these results, the patient was deemed to be a candidate for surgery.
An inflated tourniquet was applied at the time of surgery. The ulna was exposed by a longitudinal incision from the olecranon to the distal ulna between the flexor carpi ulnaris and the extensor carpi ulnaris muscles. A 13-hole locking compression plate and a 10-hole dynamic compression plate were used in an overlapping fashion for ulnar fixation (Fig. 2).
The tourniquet was deflated, hemostatic measures were performed, and the subcutaneous and skin incisions were closed. The tourniquet was then inflated again, and the supinator muscle was located through the Thompson approach between the extensor carpi radialis brevis and extensor digitorum communis muscles. As the posterior interosseous nerve traversed through the supinator muscle, we identified and protected the posterior interosseous nerve from injury during surgery. The radial shaft was exposed, and the fracture was reduced and fixed with a 9-hole dynamic compression plate (Fig. 2). The radial head was accessed through the proximal part of the same Thomson incision via the trans-extensor digitorum communis interval.
After removing the comminuted fragments of the radial head and preparing the canal, a modular radial head prosthesis (Wright Medical, Memphis, Tennessee, USA) was implanted. Joint stability was assessed, and the incision was sutured. A long-arm splint was applied with the recommendation of night use for the first postoperative month. During the first week after surgery, physical therapy was begun and involved protected active motions. This therapy progressed to active assistive motions after one month.

DISCUSSION

In 1967, Bado divided Monteggia fractures into four types based on direction of radial head dislocation and ulnar fracture angulation [1]. Monteggia fractures are rare, accounting for only 2%–5% of all proximal forearm fractures [5]. Monteggia-equivalent fractures, defined as Monteggia fractures with radial head fractures, are even rarer [6]. There have been few studies on Monteggia variants, and there is no precise and agreed upon definition of the term Monteggia variant or Monteggia-equivalent lesion [7]. There are several reports of Monteggia-equivalent fractures with no available classification system. Arora S et al suggested some Monteggia-equivalent lesions based on their literature review. A distal humeral fracture with a proximal third ulnar diaphyseal fracture and distal radial metaphyseal fracture with anterior dislocation of the radial head was presented as an example of a Bado type IV fracture [8].
In 2015, Laun et al. [9] reported 10 adult cases of proximal ulnar and radial head fractures treated with ulnar fracture plate fixation and radial head prosthesis. None of these patients had a concurrent radial shaft fracture. Jung et al. [10] and Calderazzi et al. [7] reported 27 and 12 patients, respectively, with ulnar and radial head fractures as Monteggia-like fractures. These patients were surgically managed with ulnar fracture plate fixation and radial head prosthesis. Jung et al. [10] reported that this type of fracture is prone to complications; they reported a total of 17 complications in 11 patients of a total of 27 cases after two years of follow-up. However, Calderazzi et al. [7] reported good results in Monteggia-like lesions if the injury pattern was recognized and each component of the injury was addressed.
In this study, we introduced a new variant of the Bado type IV Monteggia fracture that has not been reported previously in either adults or children. Preliminary results of the patient after four months of follow-up indicate an elbow range of motion from 15º of extension to 140º of flexion and near normal forearm rotation compared to the uninjured side (Fig. 3). The patient has a disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score of 90 and no instability on elbow examinations. Bado type IV Monteggia lesions are extremely rare in adults; to the best of our knowledge, there has been no report of a Bado Type IV Monteggia fracture dislocation accompanied by a radial head fracture dislocation. In surgical management of this case, we noted that these co-fractures caused radioulnar interosseous membrane injury; therefore, radial head excision was not reasonable, and we used a radial head prosthesis for the patient. The results four months postoperatively are excellent. We suggest this rare type of fracture be classified as a Bado type IV Monteggia-equivalent fracture. Timely surgical management with plating and radial head prosthesis of such fractures in adults results in a good prognosis.

NOTES

Author contributions

Conceptualization: BB, YF. Data curation: SB, AK. Writing – original draft: YF, BB, SB, AK. Writing – review & editing: YF, BB, SB, AK.

Conflict of interest

None.

Funding

None.

Data availability

None.

Acknowledgments

None.

Fig. 1.
Preoperative lateral radiographic view (A) and three-dimensional computed tomography scan (B, C) of the elbow and forearm of the patient.
cise-2021-00752f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Postoperative anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) views of the patient.
cise-2021-00752f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
(A-D) Four-month follow-up range of motion.
cise-2021-00752f3.jpg

REFERENCES

1. Bado JL. The Monteggia lesion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1967;50:71–86.
pmid
2. Jupiter JB, Leibovic SJ, Ribbans W, Wilk RM. The posterior Monteggia lesion. J Orthop Trauma 1991;5:395–402.
crossref pmid
3. Ring D, Jupiter JB, Simpson NS. Monteggia fractures in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:1733–44.
crossref pmid
4. Fayaz HC, Jupiter JB. Monteggia fractures in adults. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2010;77:457–62.
crossref pmid
5. Korner J, Hoffmann A, Rudig L, et al. Monteggia injuries in adults: critical analysis of injury pattern, management, and results. Unfallchirurg 2004;107:1026–40.
crossref pmid
6. Ring D. Monteggia fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 2013;44:59–66.
crossref pmid
7. Calderazzi F, Menozzi M, Nosenzo A, et al. Monteggia-like lesions: preliminary reports and mid-term results of a single center. Acta Biomed 2020;91:e2020134
pmid pmc
8. Arora S, Sabat D, Verma A, Sural S, Dhal A. An unusual monteggia equivalent: a case report with literature review. J Hand Microsurg 2011;3:82–5.
crossref pmid pmc
9. Laun R, Wild M, Brosius L, Hakimi M. Monteggia-like lesions: treatment strategies and one-year results. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW 2015;4:Doc13.
pmid pmc
10. Jung M, Groetzner-Schmidt C, Porschke F, Grützner PA, Guehring T, Schnetzke M. Monteggia-like lesions in adults treated with radial head arthroplasty-mid-term follow-up of 27 cases. J Orthop Surg Res 2020;15:5.
crossref pmid pmc


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
#6603, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea
E-mail: journal@cisejournal.org                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next