 |
|
Comparative clinical and radiologic evaluation between patients undergoing standard reversed shoulder arthroplasty or bony increased offset
Tiago Amorim-Barbosa, Ana Ribau, Hélder Fonte, Luís Henrique Barros, Rui Claro
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023;26(1):3-9. Published online 2023 Jan 17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2022.01270
|
|
Citations to this article as recorded by
 Clinical and radiological outcomes with an augmented baseplate for superior glenoid wear in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Jong H. Park, Jong H. Lee, Dae Y. Kim, Hyun G. Kim, Jae S. Kim, Sang M. Lee, Su C. Kim, Jae C. Yoo
The Bone & Joint Journal.2024; 106-B(3): 268. CrossRef Outcomes of a cementless onlay short stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty in elderly patients: a comprehensive analysis of clinical and radiological findings
Rui Claro, Arnaldo Sousa, Eurico Silva, Luís Henrique Barros
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef Lateralising reverse shoulder arthroplasty using bony increased offset (BIO-RSA) or increasing glenoid component diameter: comparison of clinical, radiographic and patient reported outcomes in a matched cohort
Arno A. Macken, Geert Alexander Buijze, Michael Kimmeyer, Tilman Hees, Denise Eygendaal, Michel van den Bekerom, Laurent Lafosse, Thibault Lafosse
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
|