CrossRef Text and Data Mining
Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.
Difference in glenoid retroversion between two-dimensional axial computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstructed images
Hyungsuk Kim, Chang Hyun Yoo, Soo Bin Park, Hyun Seok Song
Clin Shoulder Elbow. 2020;23(2):71-79.   Published online May 21, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2020.00122

Excel Download

Difference in glenoid retroversion between two-dimensional axial computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstructed images
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow. 2020;23(2):71-79   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Comparative study of glenoid version and inclination using two-dimensional images from computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstructed bone models
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow. 2020;23(3):119-124   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Simulation of surgical glenoid resurfacing using three-dimensional computed tomography of the arthritic glenohumeral joint: The amount of glenoid retroversion that can be corrected
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2009;18(5):680-688   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Reliability of measurements performed on two dimensional and three dimensional computed tomography in glenoid assessment for instability
International Orthopaedics. 2016;40(12):2581-2588   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography
The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2010;35(3):513   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Cephalometric evaluation of posteroanterior projection of reconstructed three-dimensional Cone beam computed tomography, two-dimensional conventional radiography, and direct measurements
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists. 2016;5(1):22-27   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

A comparative study between data obtained from conventional lateral cephalometry and reconstructed three-dimensional computed tomography images
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2014;40(3):123   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Conventional Humeral Retroversion Measurements Using Computed Tomography Slices or Ultrasound Images Are Not Correlated With the 3-Dimensional Humeral Retroversion Angle
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015;3(3):232596711557370   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Difference in whole spinal alignment between supine and standing positions in patients with adult spinal deformity using a new comparison method with slot-scanning three-dimensional X-ray imager and computed tomography through digital reconstructed radiography
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2018;19(1):   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Comparison of axial reconstructed ultrasonographic images from three-dimensional data volumes and computed tomographic scans in the documentation and detection of liver lesions.
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2001;20(9):953-957   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2