Persistent lateral elbow pain from overlooked posterolateral impingement of the elbow: a literature review and guidance for treatment

Gur-Aziz Singh Sidhu; Niyam Amanullah; Harjot Kaur; Saphalya Pattnaik; Neil Ashwood; Andrew Peter Dekker; Harpal Singh Selhi

doi:10.5397/cise.2023.01081

Clin Shoulder Elb > Volume 27(4); 2024 > Article

Sidhu, Amanullah, Kaur, Pattnaik, Ashwood, Peter Dekker, and Selhi: Persistent lateral elbow pain from overlooked posterolateral impingement of the elbow: a literature review and guidance for treatment

Review

Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2024; 27(4): 487-495.

Published online: August 7, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2023.01081

Persistent lateral elbow pain from overlooked posterolateral impingement of the elbow: a literature review and guidance for treatment

Gur-Aziz Singh Sidhu^1,^2,^3,

, Niyam Amanullah²

, Harjot Kaur^3,⁴

, Saphalya Pattnaik¹

, Neil Ashwood^2,⁵

, Andrew Peter Dekker²

, Harpal Singh Selhi³

¹Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospital Lewisham, London, UK

²Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Derby, UK

³Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India

⁴Department of Anesthesia, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, London, UK

⁵Research Institute Wolverhampton, London, UK

Correspondence: Gur-Aziz Singh Sidhu Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospital Lewisham, Lewisham High St, London SE13 6LH, London, UK
Tel: +44-74-5987-8084, Email: guraziz.sidhu@nhs.net

Received: December 7, 2023 Revised: February 6, 2024 Accepted: June 20, 2024

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Posterolateral impingement is sometimes diagnosed as a cause of refractory elbow pain, often after other treatments have been tried for common conditions such as lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow) or subtly different conditions common in throwing athletes, such as valgus extension overload syndrome. Arthroscopic surgical treatment is effective when targeting abnormal anatomy such as plicae folds. Partial excision of the olecranon must be undertaken with caution because it can lead to instability. This systematic review of the current literature uses a narrative synthesis to identify anatomical morphological variations of the olecranon, humeral and capitellar geometry, and overloading of the lateral part of the elbow as causative factors for this condition and discusses how arthroscopic techniques can resolve symptoms. Further understanding of the static and dynamic anatomy of the lateral part of the elbow will help to develop future treatment and preventive strategies.

Key Words: Posterolateral impingement; Epicondylitis; Lateral epicondylitis; Instability; Arthroscopy

INTRODUCTION

Our understanding of the complex anatomy of the elbow has come a long way since Peterson and Jones described the elbow as “merely a connecting joint between the hand and trunk, and restricted motion can be compensated for in other joints” in 1971 [1,2]. Although the need to treat rheumatoid arthritis has waned with the advent of biological treatment, further understanding has been driven by the need to reconstruct damaged elbow joints following trauma and the development of arthroscopic assessments and treatments for elbow conditions [3-6].

Posterolateral impingement of the elbow is an uncommon disorder that presents with lateral elbow pain that is often attributed to epicondylitis or “tennis elbow.” Thus, it is frequently missed clinically and treated with surgical techniques intended for a different injury [5-8]. Typically, patients describe overuse of the elbow, often related to sporting activities such as overhead throwing or manual work, which leads to repetitive hyperextension trauma within the lateral part of the elbow [2,5]. The hyperextension part of this movement forces the olecranon tip into the olecranon fossa. This impingement leads to osteophyte production on the olecranon tip, especially at the lateral side, which is poorly recognized as an issue. Our aim in this study was to systematically review the best evidence available in surgical and anatomical journals to better understand why this condition develops in some individuals and not others and learn how best to recognize, treat, and prevent it.

CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERING STUDIES FOR THIS REVIEW

The research question for our review was refined using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Study design (PICOS) framework [9]. We did not, however, include “Comparison” in our eligibility criteria.

Studies were considered eligible for inclusion if they met the following criteria: (1) anatomical population: anatomy of lateral elbow/capitellum/olecranon; (2) clinical population: lateral elbow pain or structure, elbow valgus extension overload syndrome, refractory epicondylitis, posterolateral impingement of the elbow; (3) intervention: reported for participants who received treatment, assessment, or imaging for posterolateral impingement/lateral elbow structures; (4) outcomes: recovery from surgery/physiotherapy or other modalities of treatment for lateral epicondylitis; and (5) study design: both randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, single-group design studies, case reports, and cadaveric dissection studies.

Studies were excluded based on the following criteria: (1) population: other causes of lateral elbow pain/epicondylitis, plicae, radial tunnel syndrome, capitellar osteochondral lesions, or radiocapitellar osteoarthritis; (2) intervention: lacked a clinically relevant surgical or anatomical component; (3) outcomes: described only assessment or definitions of posterolateral impingement; (4) study design: did not report empirical data; and (5) not published in the English language.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched for eligible studies in the following databases: Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO. All databases were searched from 1990 to January 2020. The following search algorithm was adapted for our chosen databases: (“elbow”) AND (“posterolateral”) AND (“Elbow Valgus Extension Overload Syndrome”) AND (“impingement) *” OR “anatomy” OR "surgical" OR “surgery.” The searches were conducted by a specialist librarian (within the hospital trust of the lead author) who is skilled at database searches, and the lists were amalgamated. Several search iterations were used to maximize sensitivity [10].

In addition to the electronic databases, we searched the reference lists of the included studies and relevant reviews to identify missed eligible studies. The snowballing method was adopted to include the whole breadth of the available literature, including making contact with study authors to identify additional studies [11]. The British Elbow and Shoulder Surgery and Clinical Anatomy websites were also searched for relevant articles.

STUDY SCREENING AND DATA COLLECTION PROCESS

The number of studies excluded at the title and abstract screening stage and the number of studies excluded at the full-text screening stage were recorded systematically with reasons (e.g., “not anatomical or surgically relevant” or “not lateral part of the elbow”). Three researchers (NA, GASS, NA) were involved in both the title and abstract and full-text screening stages, and where there was uncertainty in study eligibility, a consensus decision was made by at least two screeners.

Endnote was used to capture and manage the references at each stage of screening. Data extraction was undertaken using a table to facilitate the assessment of quality and eligibility when screening full articles; we used an inductive rather than deductive stance based on previously identified themes [12]. The same three researchers (NA, GASS, NA) extracted the study designs, participant characteristics (number of participants, surgical, imaging, dissections), intervention characteristics (location of intervention, method), details of outcomes assessed, and findings for each eligible outcome.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A thematic analysis with the constant comparison method was used to synthesize the findings. The literature encompassed qualitative and quantitative data of differing quality, so a narrative synthesis was chosen as the best way to interpret these articles cohesively [12].

SEARCH RESULTS

We screened 52 full-texts and excluded 31 of them for the following reasons: 20 were without description; 4 were letters or commentaries, and 5 were not relevant to the topic (Fig. 1).

RESULTS

Clinical Anatomy of the Elbow Joint

Most elbow joint stability is provided by the bony anatomy, particularly the ulnohumeral articulation, and a strong medial collateral ligament and lateral collateral ligament [13]. A primary stabilizer provides constraint, and its release causes laxity, and a secondary stabilizer is a constraint whose release alone is insufficient to cause laxity; however release of the secondary stabilizer after division of the primary stabilizer increases the laxity of the joint [13].

Medially ulnohumeral articulation behaves mechanically as a hinge joint [14]. Anatomically, the radiocapitellar articulation is a spheroidal (ball-and-socket) joint and has been described as a condyle-type joint constrained by the proximal radioulnar joint to allow only flexion/extension and pronation/supination [15]. The proximal radioulnar articulation itself constitutes a separate pivot joint [14]. The radiocapitellar joint has a much smaller surface area than the ulnohumeral joint, but it transmits higher loads, up to 60% higher when the elbow is extended and axially loaded [14,16]. Therefore, it is more prone to injury and degeneration than the ulnohumeral joint, as seen arthroscopically and in cadavers [17,18]. Indeed, the cartilage loss in the lateral part of the joint can be extensive, even when the ulnohumeral joint is preserved [19].

The transmission of forces through the radiocapitellar joint also depends on the alignment in the coronal plane because in the valgus position, only 12% of forces are transmitted through the ulnohumeral articulation, whereas in varus positions, 92% of the force passes through the humeroulnar articulation [16]. This suggests that most of the forces in the elbow joint pass through the radiocapitellar joint in both the valgus position and pronation [20]. In full extension, the muscles at the elbow are biomechanically disadvantaged, and they generate great forces across the elbow joint in extension to achieve flexion. Fig. 2 shows how simple rotational movements lead to stretching of the collateral ligaments [21,22]. Damage and stretching of the medial collateral ligament transmits most of the forces through the radiocapitellar joint, which eventually causes impingement and its consequences in the posterolateral aspect of the elbow [16].

Ring and Jupiter [23] conceptualized instability at the elbow in terms of deficiencies in the four columns of anatomical structures (anterior, medial, lateral, and posterior). Lateral arm pain at the elbow can be due to posterolateral instability and might have a bearing on the development of degenerative changes and impingement (Fig. 3) [24].

Etiopathology of Posterolateral Impingement Syndrome

The elbow joint is formed by mesenchymal cavitation and divided by synovial septa into its three main articulations [25]. Elbow synovial plicae, or folds, are septal remnants of this process that can hypertrophy, causing mechanical symptoms and impingement from soft tissues within the lateral part of the joint [26]. Joint congruence is also a factor because it can lead to the development of degenerative joint disease and impingement [27]. A biomechanical analysis of radiocapitellar arthroplasty showed significant capitellar morphological variation, making implant design difficult and also contributing to cartilage thickness variance. Congruence showed significant sexual dimorphism in the shape of the olecranon fossa and shape variance at the olecranon tip [28-30]. Congruent joints covered by thin articular cartilage have a low incidence of degenerative joint disease, whereas joints with thicker cartilage, such as the radiocapitellar joint, can be overworked during cyclic deformation under load and shear stresses [27]. Material fatigue with repetitive loading might initiate mechanical disruption of the cartilage and begin the process of degenerative disease. Throwing athletes and boxers are predisposed to posterolateral impingement. The act of throwing produces a combination of valgus forces and rapid extension that results in tensile forces along the medial side, compression on the lateral side of the elbow, and shear forces in the posterior compartment. Repetitive valgus overloading of the medial collateral ligament results in medial instability and abnormal valgus rotation of the elbow [31]. That has three consequences (Fig. 4): (1) Increased contact pressures over a decreased area in the posteromedial elbow, particularly between the medial tip of the olecranon and the medial crista of the humeral trochlea. (2) Posterior impingement of the elbow as the olecranon is wedged into the fossa during acceleration and the subsequent development of osteophytes and possible loose bodies within the elbow joint. (3) Increased compressive forces across the radiocapitellar joint, which leads to cartilage injury, osteochondritis dissecans lesions, and fragmentation.

Continued valgus and extension forces can produce olecranon tip osteophytes, loose bodies in the posterior or radiocapitellar compartment, and articular damage on the posteromedial trochlea caused by the olecranon osteophyte (the so-called kissing lesion), with chondromalacia on the posteromedial trochlea (olecranon fossa) [32]. The exact fit of the olecranon in the olecranon fossa of the humerus appears to be critical for maximal extension and therefore for the function of the elbow, and disturbances to this fit can lead to significant posterolateral impingement [17,33]. Partial resection of the olecranon in in vitro studies on cadavers increased valgus angulation and torque within the elbow with all levels of resection [34]. Statistically significant ulnar collateral ligament strain and instability developed after 9mm of resection [35]. Throwing athletes will perform badly with this increased strain on their medial collateral ligament. However, bone removal from the olecranon should be limited to osteophytes without the removal of normal bone because even small amounts of bone resection from the olecranon affect elbow stability [36]. Patients who overload their medial collateral ligament can develop olecranon osteophytes, so stability needs to be assessed clinically [37]. Posterolateral rotatory instability results from injury to the lateral ulnar collateral ligament complex, and patients experience mechanical symptoms such as clicking, popping, or grinding, particularly at forty degrees of flexion. The tests for this injury are the lateral pivot shift test and push-up chair test [38].

IMAGING

Radiographs

Radiographs are helpful in detecting osteophytes on the olecranon or the borders of the posterior fossa, but the shape appears to be variable. Radiographs cannot detect mechanical impingement from soft tissues or plica [25,30]. The axial oblique view is helpful in detecting osteophytes and loose bodies on the olecranon or the borders of the posterior fossa. The elbow is flexed to 110° with the arm on the cassette and the beam angled at 45° toward the ulna (Fig. 5).

Ultrasound

Ultrasound can help to identify plica and assess the common extensor origin of lateral elbow pain in general [25,39]. A dynamic ultrasound allows a real-time evaluation of the moving elbow and can help to assess the stability of the ulnar collateral ligament [40]. It can also be used to evaluate the course of the posterior interosseous nerve and detect muscle tears, effusions, or osteophytes [39,41].

Computer Tomography

A computer Tomography (CT) scan defines the extent of wear within the elbow, which can be useful when planning surgery for arthritis, although some would argue that magnetic resonance arthrography is more useful in assessing intraarticular pathology and the extent of any loose bodies when x-rays are unclear [42,43]. When throwing throwers present with unusual posterior elbow pain and no significant findings on radiographs, a CT scan should be performed to exclude a stress fracture [44]. Some analysis has been performed on variations in olecranon shape, but more work is required to better understand them, especially posterolaterally (Fig. 6) [30].

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanning

Magnetic resonance imaging scans are extremely useful in defining intraarticular pathology, especially in equivocal cases when the diagnosis is uncertain [25,43,45]. They can rule out other causes of posterolateral elbow pain such as hypertrophied fat pads, olecranon stress fractures, subtle radiocapitellar osteoarthritis, osteochondritis dissecans, radiocapitellar synovitis, and extensor tendinopathy [46,47]. Stress fractures appear as linear decreases in signal intensity on T1W images, typically with marrow edema, and they are seen as increases in signal intensity on fat-suppressed T2W or short inversion-time inversion recovery images (Fig. 7).

TREATMENT

Initially, patients should be encouraged to rest and rehabilitate, with throwers avoiding triceps exercises that would continue to irritate the olecranon and exacerbate the impingement [47]. A gradual return to interval throwing supervised by a sports physiotherapist is allowed as symptoms resolve [47]. Persistent symptoms following active non-operative treatment were managed successfully by arthroscopic debridement of the elbow in 90% of 28 patients treated by this method in the literature; those patients returned to their preoperative levels, including sport [48,49]. During surgery, debridement of the posterior fossa of the elbow was performed until there was no further impingement of any soft tissue or visible bony osteophytes [49].

Open surgery was used with good results for the removal of loose bodies, resection of osteophytes and posterior spurs from the olecranon, synovectomy, and joint debridement [32]. However arthroscopic surgery gives comparable outcomes with faster rehabilitation and less hospitalization, which makes it more cost effective [50-54]. Arthroscopy also provides better joint visualization than open techniques, which require large surgical exposure and incisions to see the same area and thus increase the patient's potential morbidity [50].

Posterior impingement can also be part of a more widespread degenerative arthritis of the elbow, so preoperative evaluation is important to determine the extent of the disease, which can influence the treatment results and recovery [42]. A retrospective study by Adams et al. [50] analyzed 41 patients with primary osteoarthritis in 42 elbows. Preoperative pain, motion, and Mayo Elbow Performance Index scores were compared with those at the latest follow-up. The patients all underwent arthroscopic osteophyte resection and capsulectomy. At an average follow-up of more than 3 years, 81% of cases reported statistically significant improvements in mean flexion, extension, supination, and Mayo Elbow Performance Index [50]. In 1995, Ogilvie-Harris et al. [51] achieved good (n=7) or excellent results (n=14) in 21 patients treated with arthroscopic debridement for posterior impingement associated with degenerative elbow arthritis. Three criteria were used to determine the need for therapeutic arthroscopy: painful loss of extension of at least 10°, interference of function in sports or work-related duties, and radiographic evidence of posterior loose bodies or osteophytes of the olecranon fossa or posterior olecranon [51].

Arthroscopic elbow debridement surgery is undertaken in four stages: anterior elbow joint debridement followed by the posterior removal of loose bodies, olecranon osteophytes, and osteophytes in the olecranon fossa [51,52].

Elbow arthroscopy is also useful as a diagnostic adjunct when impingement is suspected but imaging has been equivocal. Selby and O’Brian found impingement from soft tissues and the fat pad upon arthroscopy in five young pitchers who presented with complaints of dysfunction and pain on terminal elbow extension of their throwing arms. Debridement of the soft tissues and aberrant fat pad led to resolution of the pitchers’ symptoms. Similar good outcomes have been achieved for posteromedial impingement, a related condition [54]. Table 1 consolidated the literature studies and outcomes with individual authors.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterolateral impingement syndrome of the elbow remains a difficult condition to diagnose clinically, and pain is often attributed to degeneration or pathology in the common extensor tendon. Currently, arthroscopic surgery is the preferable option for treatment because it has faster rehabilitation and less hospitalization than open surgery and is therefore more cost effective. Moreover, arthroscopy provides better joint visualization than open techniques. Further research into normal olecranon geometry is required because excision of the olecranon tip is advocated as part of the surgical procedure, and over-resection can lead to instability, as shown in previous cadaveric studies.

NOTES

Author contributions

Conceptualization: GASS, NA (Neil Ashwood). Data curation: GASS, SP, AD. Formal analysis: GASS, NA (Niyam Amanullah). Investigation: GASS, SIDHU, NA (Niyam Amanullah). Methodology: GASS, SIDHU, NA (Niyam Amanullah), HK, SP, NA (Neil Ashwood), AD. Project administration: NA (Neil Ashwood). Resources: NA (Neil Ashwood). Software: HK, SP. Supervision: NA (Neil Ashwood), HSS. Validation: HSS. Visualization: AD, HSS. Writing – original draft: GASS, SIDHU, HK, NA, HSS. Writing – review & editing: GASS, SIDHU.

Conflict of interest

None.

Funding

None.

Data availability

None.

Acknowledgments

None.

Fig. 1.

Search strategy for our review.

Fig. 2.

Contact stresses at the distal humerus and capitellum, which are increased in extension and reduced in flexion.

Fig. 3.

Ring concept of stability by Ring and Jupiter [23].

Fig. 4.

Etiopathology of posterolateral impingement syndrome.

Fig. 5.

Osteophyte formation on the posterolateral corner of the olecranon on anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) radiographs.

Fig. 6.

Computer tomography scan showing impingement of the olecranon tip on the olecranon fossa.

Fig. 7.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are particularly useful for evaluating symptomatic posterolateral impingement of the elbow. (A) T1W axial MRI shows a linear low-signal fracture line (arrow) traversing the olecranon. (B) Short inversion-time inversion recovery sagittal MRI shows increased signal (asterisk) corresponding to marrow edema in the olecranon.

Table 1.

Literature studies showing results of arthroscopic treatment for PLRI by different authors

Study	Level	Case	Follow-up	Result
Kim et al. (2006) [47]	IV	12	12 mo	Excellent
Valkering et al. (2008) [5]	IV	5	12 mo	Satisfactory to good
Rahusen et al. (2009) [49]	IV	16	38 mo	MAESS increased postoperatively (P<0.05), VAS at rest decreased from 3 to 0 and, VAS after provocation decreased from 7 to 2.
Robinson et al. (2017) [52]	IV	7	15 mo	Mean DASH score, 2.7
Park et al. (2016) [31]	III	20	24 mo	MEPI improved from 66 to 89.
Park et al. (2016) [31]	III	20	24 mo	DASH improved from 26 to 14.
Park et al. (2019) [26]	III	24	24 mo	MEPI improved from 56.9 to 95.6.
Park et al. (2019) [26]	III	24	24 mo	DASH improved from 36.6 to 8.9.

PLRI: posterolateral rotatory instability, MAESS: Modified Andrews Elbow Scoring System, VAS: visual analog scale, DASH: Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand, MEPI: Mayo Elbow Performance Index.

REFERENCES

1. Peterson LF, Janes JM. Surgery of the rheumatoid elbow. Orthop Clin North Am 1971;2:667–77.

2. Morrey BF, Tanaka S, An KN. Valgus stability of the elbow: a definition of primary and secondary constraints. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991;187–95.

3. Girdler SJ, Ye I, Tang R, Kirschner N. Altering the natural history of rheumatoid arthritis: the role of immunotherapy and biologics in orthopaedic care. J Orthop 2019;17:17–21.

4. Desai SJ, Lalone E, Athwal GS, Ferreira LM, Johnson JA, King GJ. Hemiarthroplasty of the elbow: the effect of implant size on joint congruency. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016;25:297–303.

5. Valkering KP, van der Hoeven H, Pijnenburg BC. Posterolateral elbow impingement in professional boxers. Am J Sports Med 2008;36:328–32.

6. Adams JE, King GJ, Steinmann SP, Cohen MS. Elbow arthroscopy: indications, techniques, outcomes, and complications. Instr Course Lect 2015;64:215–24.

7. Ahmad Z, Siddiqui N, Malik SS, Abdus-Samee M, Tytherleigh-Strong G, Rushton N. Lateral epicondylitis: a review of pathology and management. Bone Joint J 2013;95:1158–64.

8. Moskal MJ. Arthroscopic treatment of posterior impingement of the elbow in athletes. Clin Sports Med 2001;20:11–24.

9. Schardt C, Adams MB, Owens T, Keitz S, Fontelo P. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2007;7:16.

10. Booth A. Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review. Syst Rev 2016;5:74.

11. Greenhalgh T, Peacock R. Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. BMJ 2005;331:1064–5.

12. Aveyard H, Payne S, Preston N. A post-graduate’s guide to doing a literature review: in health and social care. 1st ed. Open University Press; 2016.

13. de Haan J, Schep NW, Eygendaal D, Kleinrensink GJ, Tuinebreijer WE, den Hartog D. Stability of the elbow joint: relevant anatomy and clinical implications of in vitro biomechanical studies. Open Orthop J 2011;5:168–76.

14. Pooley J, Van der Linden D. Clinical and pathological perspectives on elbow arthritis and arthroplasty. Ann Jt 2021;6:9.

15. Vaquero-Picado A, Núñez de Armas J, Antuña S, Barco R. Morphometry of the radiocapitellar joint: is humeral condyle diameter a reliable predictor of the size of the radial head prosthesis? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018;27:1092–6.

16. Cain EL, Dugas JR, Wolf RS, Andrews JR. Elbow injuries in throwing athletes: a current concepts review. Am J Sports Med 2003;31:621–35.

17. Ahrens PM, Redfern DR, Forester AJ. Patterns of articular wear in the cadaveric elbow joint. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001;10:52–6.

18. Rajeev A, Pooley J. Lateral compartment cartilage changes and lateral elbow pain. Acta Orthop Belg 2009;75:37–40.

19. Murata H, Ikuta Y, Murakami T. An anatomic investigation of the elbow joint, with special reference to aging of the articular cartilage. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1993;2:175–81.

20. Hwang JT, Kim Y, Shields MN, et al. Effects of axial forearm instability on force transmission across the elbow. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019;28:170–7.

21. Chantelot C, Wavreille G, Dos Remedios C, Landejerit B, Fontaine C, Hildebrand H. Intra-articular compressive stress of the elbow joint in extension: an experimental study using Fuji films. Surg Radiol Anat 2008;30:103–11.

22. Wang Y, Sun Y, Chen J, Kholinne E, Jeon IH, Tan J. In vivo changes in length of elbow collateral ligaments during pronation and supination on an outstretched arm. Surg Radiol Anat 2020;42:919–25.

23. Ring D, Jupiter JB. Fracture-dislocation of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:566–80.

24. O'Driscoll SW, Bell DF, Morrey BF. Posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:440–6.

25. Cerezal L, Rodriguez-Sammartino M, Canga A, et al. Elbow synovial fold syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:W88–96.

26. Park KB, Kim SJ, Chun YM, Yoon TH, Choi YS, Jung M. Clinical and diagnostic outcomes in arthroscopic treatment for posterolateral plicae impingement within the radiocapitellar joint. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e15497.

27. Wilson DR, McWalter EJ, Johnston JD. The measurement of joint mechanics and their role in osteoarthritis genesis and progression. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2013;39:21–44.

28. Sabo MT, McDonald CP, Ng J, Ferreira LM, Johnson JA, King GJ. A morphological analysis of the humeral capitellum with an interest in prosthesis design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011;20:880–4.

29. Ammer S, d'Oliveira Coelho J, Cunha EM. Outline shape analysis on the trochlear constriction and olecranon fossa of the humerus: insights for sex estimation and a new computational tool. J Forensic Sci 2019;64:1788–95.

30. Wegmann K, Knowles NK, Lalone EE, et al. The shape match of the olecranon tip for reconstruction of the coronoid process: influence of side and osteotomy angle. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019;28:e117–24.

31. Park JY, Yoo HY, Chung SW, et al. Valgus extension overload syndrome in adolescent baseball players: clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016;25:2048–56.

32. Andrews JR, Jelsma RD, Joyce ME, Timmerman LA. Open surgical procedures for injuries to the elbow in throwers. Oper Tech Sports Med 1996;4:109–13.

33. Ravalli S, Pulici C, Binetti S, Aglieco A, Vecchio M, Musumeci G. An overview of the pathogenesis and treatment of elbow osteoarthritis. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol 2019;4:30.

34. Kamineni S, Hirahara H, Pomianowski S, et al. Partial posteromedial olecranon resection: a kinematic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:1005–11.

35. Levin JS, Zheng N, Dugas J, Cain EL, Andrews JR. Posterior olecranon resection and ulnar collateral ligament strain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004;13:66–71.

36. Bell TH, Ferreira LM, McDonald CP, Johnson JA, King GJ. Contribution of the olecranon to elbow stability: an in vitro biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:949–57.

37. Pollock JW, Brownhill J, Ferreira LM, McDonald CP, Johnson JA, King GJ. Effect of the posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament on elbow stability. J Hand Surg Am 2009;34:116–23.

38. Camp CL, Smith J, O'Driscoll SW. Posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow: part I. Mechanism of injury and the posterolateral rotatory drawer test. Arthrosc Tech 2017;6:e401–5.

39. Obuchowicz R, Bonczar M. Ultrasonographic differentiation of lateral elbow pain. Ultrasound Int Open 2016;2:E38–46.

40. De Smet AA, Winter TC, Best TM, Bernhardt DT. Dynamic sonography with valgus stress to assess elbow ulnar collateral ligament injury in baseball pitchers. Skeletal Radiol 2002;31:671–6.

41. Zytoon AA, Eid H, Sakr A, El Abbass HA, Kamel M. Ultrasound assessment of elbow enthesitis in patients with seronegative arthropathies. J Ultrasound 2013;17:33–40.

42. Carlier Y, Lenoir H, Rouleau DM, et al. Arthroscopic debridement for osteoarthritis of the elbow: results and analysis of predictive factors. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2019;105:S221–7.

43. Delport AG, Zoga AC. MR and CT arthrography of the elbow. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2012;16:15–26.

44. Fujioka H, Tsunemi K, Takagi Y, Tanaka J. Treatment of stress fracture of the olecranon in throwing athletes with internal fixation through a small incision. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol 2012;4:49.

45. Allen GM, Johnson R. Radiographic/MR imaging correlation of the elbow. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2019;27:587–99.

46. Hamada D, Matsuura T, Sugiura K, et al. An unusual cause of posterior elbow impingement: detachment of a hypertrophied posterior fat pad. Case Rep Orthop 2015;2015:121646.

47. Kim DH, Gambardella RA, Elattrache NS, Yocum LA, Jobe FW. Arthroscopic treatment of posterolateral elbow impingement from lateral synovial plicae in throwing athletes and golfers. Am J Sports Med 2006;34:438–44.

48. Hepler MD, Steinman S, Rosenwasser M. Elbow arthroscopy in the treatment of posterior olecranon impingement. Arthroscopy 1998;14:430.

49. Rahusen FT, Brinkman JM, Eygendaal D. Arthroscopic treatment of posterior impingement of the elbow in athletes: a medium-term follow-up in sixteen cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009;18:279–82.

50. Adams JE, Wolff LH, Merten SM, Steinmann SP. Osteoarthritis of the elbow: results of arthroscopic osteophyte resection and capsulectomy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17:126–31.

51. Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Gordon R, MacKay M. Arthroscopic treatment for posterior impingement in degenerative arthritis of the elbow. Arthroscopy 1995;11:437–43.

52. Robinson PM, Loosemore M, Watts AC. Boxer's elbow: internal impingement of the coronoid and olecranon process. A report of seven cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017;26:376–81.

53. Selby RM, O’Brien SJ. Extension impingement in the throwing elbow: diagnosis and treatment via elbow arthroscopy (SS-65). Arthroscopy 2002;5:51.

54. Cohen SB, Valko C, Zoga A, Ciccotti MG. Posteromedial elbow impingement: MRI findings in overhead throwing athletes and results of arthroscopic treatment (SS-26). Arthroscopy 2009;25:14–5.