Arthroscopic evaluation of the rotator cuff vasculature: inferences into the pathogenesis of cuff tear and re-tear

Article information

Clin Shoulder Elb. 2024;27(2):203-211

Publication date (electronic) : 2024 May 24

doi : https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2024.00066

Steafano Gumina ¹^,²^,^*

, Hyun Seok Song ³^,^*

, Hyungsuk Kim ³

, Vittorio Candela^,⁴

¹Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

²Istituto Chirurgico Ortopedico Traumatologico (ICOT), Latina, Italy

³Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea

⁴Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Umberto I Polyclinic of Rome, Rome, Italy

Correspondending author: Vittorio Candela Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome 00185, Italy Tel: +39-6-491672 Fax: +39-6-491703 E-mail: vittorio.candela@yahoo.it

*These authors contributed equally to this study as first authors.

Received 2024 January 24; Revised 2024 March 15; Accepted 2024 March 28.

Abstract

Background

Little is known about alterations of the rotator cuff (RC) macroscopic vasculature associated with medical conditions and/or habits that predispose a person to diseases of the peripheral microcirculation. The high frequency of cuff tear and re-tear in patients with diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, uncontrolled arterial hypertension, or metabolic syndrome may be due to tissue hypovascularity.

Methods

The macroscopic vasculature of both the articular and bursal sides of the posterosuperior RC was evaluated arthroscopically in 107 patients (mean age, 58.2 years) with no RC tear. Patients were divided into three groups according to medical comorbidities and lifestyle factors (group I, none; group II, smokers and/or drinkers and one comorbidity; and group III, two or more comorbidities). Pulsating vessels originating from both the myotendinous and osteotendinous junctions were assessed as “clearly evident,” “poorly evident,” or “not evident.”

Results

Groups I, II, and III comprised 36, 45, and 26 patients, respectively. Within the myotendinous junction, vessels were visualized in 22 group I patients (61%), 25 group II patients (55%), and 6 group III patients (23%) (P=0.007). Pulsating arterial vessels originating from the osteotendinous junction were seen in 42%, 36%, and 0% of patients, respectively (P<0.001). Within the bursal side of the RC, a dense anastomotic network was visualized (either clearly or poorly) in 94% (34), 80% (36), and 35% (9) of patients, respectively (P<0.001).

Conclusions

The macroscopic vasculature of the RC is influenced by pre-existing diseases and lifestyle factors, which may impair peripheral microcirculation.

Level of evidence

III.

Keywords: Rotator cuff injuries; Vasculature; Microvasculature

INTRODUCTION

Degeneration and consequent tearing of the rotator cuff (RC) have been largely attributed to the tissue's physiological senescence and intrinsic factors. Intrinsic factors fall into two categories: medical conditions (comorbidity) and lifestyle factors. The comorbidities thought to be associated with RC tear include diabetes [1-3], hypercholesterolemia [4-6], uncontrolled arterial hypertension [7], metabolic syndrome, and obesity [8,9]. Additional lifestyle factors that may predispose an individual to RC tear include smoking [10-12], disordered eating (eating disorders) [8,9], and excessive alcohol consumption [13], each of which may contribute to peripheral microcirculatory disease. The microcirculation of the RC is of particular interest with respect to the etiology of RV tear [14].

The tendons of the RC are supplied by the suprascapular, thoracoacromial, scapular circumflex, and anterior and posterior humeral circumflex arteries [15-19]. The posterior humeral circumflex artery supplies the teres minor tendon [20]; however, its role in the vascularization of the supraspinatus tendon is still a matter of debate, whereby this role is accepted by Determe et al. [21] but denied by Põldoja et al. [15]. The anterior and posterior circumflex humeral arteries cross the osteotendinous junction to provide most of the blood supply to the posterosuperior cuff [20,22]. Brooks et al. [23] found no significant difference between the vascularity of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons from their humeral insertions. The supraspinatus muscle receives its blood supply from the suprascapular and dorsal scapular arteries, while the infraspinatus muscle is supplied by the suprascapular and circumflex scapular arteries [17]. However, the subscapular artery has been found to supply the greater portion of the infraspinatus muscle circulation through its dorsal or circumflex scapular branch [24]. The blood supply of the teres minor muscle derives from several vessels, typically including the branch arising from the posterior humeral scapular circumflex artery [24].

In this study, we performed arthroscopic visualization of the distribution of visible vessels on the articular and bursal sides of the posterosuperior cuff to investigate whether there were any macroscopic differences between subjects with and without the above-noted conditions and lifestyle factors. Our hypothesis was that these conditions compromised the vascular supply of the RC.

METHODS

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Sapienza University of Rome, which waived the requirement for informed consent since a standard surgical procedure was performed and the anonymity of the patients was ensured during data collection.

This prospective study initially included 128 patients aged 50 to 72 years at Istituto Chirurgico Ortopedico Traumatologico (ICOT) who underwent shoulder arthroscopy from January 2017 to December 2022 for examination of the macroscopic vasculature of the posterosuperior RC. Twenty-one patients diagnosed with RC tears, frozen shoulder, rheumatic, autoimmune diseases, and fracture sequelae were excluded. Patients who had undergone injections (intra-articular or subacromial) of aspirin, antiplatelet agents, steroids, or any other viscosupplementary substance were excluded [25].

Arthroscopic Evaluation

All procedures were performed by the senior author (SG). All arthroscopic procedures were performed with the patient under general anesthesia in the beach-chair position. The irrigation pump (Crossflow Arthroscopy Pump, Stryker) was set to 60 mmHg. Systolic blood pressure was maintained around 100 mmHg.

The conventional arthroscopic procedure [26] was augmented with additional steps to evaluate the macroscopic vascularization of the posterosuperior cuff from both the articular and bursal sides (through anterior and posterior portals). The arthroscope was inserted close to the tendons in an anteroposterior and mediolateral direction. The subacromial bursa was resected to expose the cuff on the bursal side.

Vessels originating from the myotendinous junction were “clearly evident,” “poorly evident,” or “not evident” when the anteroposterior extension was at least 1−3 cm, 0.5−1 cm, or <0.5 cm, respectively. The same criteria were adopted to evaluate the vascular extension of the vessels at the osteotendinous junction. The vessels on the bursal side were considered “well represented,” “poorly represented,” or “not represented” when the extension was 1−3 cm, 0.5−1 cm, or <0.5 cm, respectively. All measurements were performed using a millimeter-scale graduated probe.

Groups

For comparison of variables, the patients were divided into three groups. In group I, the patients had no comorbidities (diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, uncontrolled arterial hypertension, metabolic syndrome, or obesity) or unhealthy lifestyle factors (smoking, eating disorder, or excessive alcohol intake). Group II comprised patients who were smokers (defined as any patient who smoked at least 10 cigarettes per day at the time of surgery or with a smoking history of more than 40 pack-years [11,12]), drinkers (defined as consuming more than 24 g alcohol per day for at least 2 years [13]), and had one of the following comorbidities (diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, uncontrolled arterial hypertension, or body mass index >30 kg/m²). In group III, the patients were smokers and/or drinkers and had two or more of the above comorbidities.

Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses of categorical data were performed using the chi-square test to identify associations between vascular type and patient group (as described above). In addition, Cramer’s V test was used to measure effect size for tests of association for nominal variables. The Cramer’s V statistic varies from 0 to 1, with 0 indicating no association and 1 indicating a perfect association. Cohen indicates the interpretation of V based on the k value, where k is the minimum number of categories in either rows or columns. For k=3, Cramer’s V values ranging from 0.07 to 0.20 indicate a weak association, values ranging from 0.20 to 0.35 indicate a moderate association, and values greater or equal to 0.35 indicate a strong association. Significance levels for multiple comparisons were adjusted using the Bonferroni procedure to maintain control of the false discovery rate. Calculated P-values were two-tailed with a 95% confidence interval, where appropriate, and a P-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The final study group comprised 107 patients (59 male and 48 female). The mean age was 58.2±4.1 years. Groups I, II, and III comprised 36, 45, and 26 patients, respectively (Table 1). These patients underwent arthroscopic examination to assess glenohumeral instability without RC tear (28 patients), acromioclavicular injury (type III and V) with possible concomitant pathologies (e.g., superior labrum anterior to posterior; 32 patients), acute rupture of the biceps long head tendon with healthy cuff (29 patients), and low-grade (Samilson-Prieto 1) glenohumeral arthropathy without synovitis after undergoing chondroplasty (18 patients).

Table 1.

Distribution of patients within the three study groups

The vessels identified in the myotendinous junction after arthroscopic examination of the articular side of the posterosuperior cuff are shown in Fig. 1. Differences between the three patient groups were significant (χ²=14.21, df=4, P=0.007), with a Cramer’s V=0.258 for k=3, which indicates a moderate strength of association. These vessels were extremely thin, ran parallel to each other and perpendicular to the tendon insertion, and usually ran in pairs. When visible, the vessels did not reach the tendon insertion, which macroscopically appeared not to be vascularized (see critical area identified in Fig. 2). Some pairs of vessels formed terminal loops. The loops suggest that the vessels were interrupted, and that their inability to be visualized is not simply due to their deep position in the tissue.

Fig. 1.

Comparison of the vessels identified in the myotendinous junction of the shoulder joints of the three patient groups. Group I: patients without comorbidities or unhealthy lifestyle factors, Group II: smokers and/or drinkers with 1 of diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, arterial hypertension, or metabolic syndrome, Group III: smokers and/or drinkers with two or more of the above comorbidities.

Fig. 2.

Intra-articular view of a right shoulder from the posterior portal (patient placed in the beach-chair position). The vessels identified on the articular side were extremely thin, ran parallel to each other and perpendicular to the tendon insertion, and usually ran in pairs. The vessels did not reach the tendon insertion, which appeared macroscopically to not be vascularized (asterisk; critical area). HH: humeral head, LHBT: long head biceps tendon.

The arterial vessels (pulsating) identified as originating from the osteotendinous junction are shown in Fig. 3. A significant difference between the three patient groups was found (χ²=19.576, df=4, P<0.001) with a Cramer’s V=0.302 for k=3, which indicates a moderate strength of association. When visible, these vessels were thin, immediately branched into vessels of smaller caliber, and were not observed after 3−7 mm (Fig. 4, Supplementary Video 1).

Fig. 3.

Comparison of the vessels identified in the osteotendinous junction of the shoulder joints of the three patient groups. Group I: patients without comorbidities or unhealthy lifestyle factors, Group II: smokers and/or drinkers with 1 of diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, arterial hypertension, or metabolic syndrome, Group III: smokers and/or drinkers with two or more of the above comorbidities.

Fig. 4.

Intra-articular view of a right shoulder from the posterior portal (patient placed in the beach-chair position). Arterial vessels (pulsating) originating from the osteotendinous junction (white arrows) and arterial vessels originating from the musculotendinous junction (black arrows) were identified. The critical area (asterisks) appeared macroscopically to not be vascularized in both the diastolic (A) and systolic (B) phases. HH: humeral head.

When viewed from the bursal side of the posterosuperior cuff, a dense anastomotic network (Fig. 5) was identified in 94% (34) of group I patients (clearly evident, 28 patients; poorly evident, 6 patients), 80% (36) of group II patients (clearly evident, 26 patients; poorly evident, 10 patients), and 35% (9) of group III patients (clearly evident, 2 patients; poorly evident, 7 patients) (Fig. 6). These differences were significant (χ²=37.15, df=4, P<0.001), with Cramer’s V=0.417 for k=3, which indicates a strong association. These vessels were very superficial and of small caliber. It was sufficient to place a hooked probe about 8−10 mm from the osteotendinous insertion, without exerting pressure on the underlying tissue, to interrupt the blood flow. By detaching the probe from the cuff, the flow immediately resumed, and the area containing the anastomosis, previously and temporarily avascular, was once again supplied by vessels with flow in the opposite direction (Fig. 7).

Fig. 5.

Subacromial view of a left shoulder from the posterior portal (patient placed in the beach-chair position). A dense anastomotic network was present on the bursal side. The vessels were superficial and of a small caliber.

Fig. 6.

Comparison of the vessels identified on the bursal side of the shoulder joints of the three patient groups. Group I: patients without comorbidities or unhealthy lifestyle factors; Group II: smokers and/or drinkers with 1 of diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, arterial hypertension, or metabolic syndrome; Group III: smokers and/or drinkers with two or more of the above comorbidities.

Fig. 7.

Subacromial view of a left shoulder from the posterior portal (patient placed in the beach-chair position). The hooked probe was able to interrupt the blood flow even without exerting pressure on the underlying tissue (A). By detaching the probe from the cuff (B-E), the flow immediately resumed, and the area containing the anastomosis, previously and temporarily avascularized, was once again vascularized.

DISCUSSION

Our study showed that subjects with comorbidities or lifestyle habits capable of compromising the peripheral microcirculation had a less evident vascular texture of the RC on both the articular and bursal sides. This association was stronger for patients with more comorbidities or unhealthy lifestyle factors. The etiology or mechanism underlying this association remains a matter of debate. Various pathological conditions, including hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, hypertension [27-29], aging [27] and exposure to specific drugs [27], may impact endothelial function by disrupting the molecular mechanisms regulating nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability. NO is the major endothelium-derived second messenger responsible for the maintenance of vascular homeostasis. Reduction in NO bioavailability, resulting from reduced NO production and/or increased NO degradation by superoxide anion, marks the onset of endothelial dysfunction [30].

The aforementioned pathologies are also responsible for an increase in the plasma concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are formed as byproducts of physiological metabolism of molecular oxygen [27,30] or during bacterial killing and host defense responses [27,30-32]. At physiological concentrations, ROS act as important second messengers that transduce intracellular signals involved in various biological processes [28,33]. However, when aberrant production of ROS exceeds the buffering capacity of the antioxidant defense systems or when antioxidant enzymes are defective, oxidative stress occurs. Several studies have shown that oxidative stress plays a pivotal role in mediating the production and secretion of cytokines [30-33], linking ROS with inflammation and endothelial activation and dysfunction. Accumulation of ROS may induce apoptosis of tenocytes through the action of mediators such as metalloproteinases, cytokines, and c-Jun N-terminal kinases, which, when phosphorylated, leads to cell death [27,33]. Over time, apoptosis causes matrix degeneration and reductions in collagen synthesis and mechanical tendon resistance, leading to tissue degeneration and disruption/tearing [27,33].

Chansky and Iannotti [19] and Rothman and Parke [6] postulated that hypovascularity plays a significant role in the genesis of RC degeneration and tearing. Rathbun and Macnab [34] undertook a microangiographic study in which injected specimens were sectioned to show a histologic correlation between the area of vascularity and the degenerative pattern observed. Those researchers found that degenerative changes first occurred in the area of hypovascularity and were always more extensive in that area.

As previously noted by Lohr and Uhthoff [22], we observed that the articular side of the tendon is at a disadvantage in terms of blood supply in comparison with the bursal side. It might be hypothesized that this deficient vascularization increases susceptibility of the articular side to degenerative changes and, consequently, to tears.

Our study also showed that the vessels on the bursal side of the RC form a dense anastomotic network and are thin in caliber. Furthermore, we found that the blood flow of these vessels can be easily interrupted by placing a hooked probe on them without exerting pressure. These findings indicated that the vascular supply of these vessels is precarious. Some authors have suggested that the vascular supply of the cuff can be changed according to the position of the arm [34]. These data led us to ask if double row (DR) complex constructs are strongly ischemic and predisposed to failure. Although the literature provides indications that the DR offers greater likelihood of a mechanical seal than simple constructions (single row [SR]) [35-41], the failure rate of DR is still high.

There is an apparent contradiction with respect to the DR technique, in that it is a biomechanically superior construct but is hypothetically a more ischemic construct compared to the SR technique. However, none of the published studies comparing the two techniques have taken into account the state of degeneration of the tissue to be repaired, which is independent of the macroscopic characteristics of the tissue and the tear size. For example, Sethi et al. [42] found that the degree of tendinopathy was not correlated with the morphological appearance of the tendon, and neither of these parameters were correlated with healing or patient outcome. The authors concluded that the degree of tendinopathy, unlike muscle atrophy, may not be predictive of outcomes, and that a tendon that appears to be of poor quality may have adequate healing capacity. Therefore, abnormal gross tendon appearance should not affect the repair effort or technique. Nor, in order to compare the two techniques, they have been considered parameters, such as osteoporosis [43], comorbidities [14], genetics [44], or direction of the anchors into the greater tuberosity [20] have been found to influence tendon healing. In the last two decades, the focus has shifted from forcing the tendon to remain in contact with the bone through the use of the biomechanically more tenacious construct to optimize healing of the RC by ensuring the tendon had the vascular supply necessary for healing.

Our study demonstrated that the superficial and macroscopically vascularization of the RC is reduced when the shoulder is in extension in patients with comorbidities or lifestyle habits that predispose them to impairment of the peripheral microcirculation. Therefore, it can be postulated that deficient vascularization makes the RC tissue more susceptible to degenerative changes and, consequently, to tears. Furthermore, because the macroscopically visible vessels were thin and their blood flow was easily interrupted upon contact with a probe with little or no pressure exerted, we suggest re-evaluation of the long-term effectiveness of securing a torn RC with strong and taut sutures that may ultimately result in local ischemia and failure of the repair. Unfortunately, the available studies comparing the outcomes of the DR vs. SR techniques for RC repair have not taken into account the initial state of degeneration of the tissue to be repaired, and the findings cannot be used to support our hypothesis.

The limitations of this study included the small sample size and the subjective grading of vascularity of the shoulder joint tissues. Furthermore, no statistical correlation was observed between vascular appearance and age. As acute trauma (acromioclavicular injury) may affect the vasculature of the RC, any patient having a hemarthrosis on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

The vascularization of the RC is macroscopically influenced by factors than may impair peripheral microcirculation, including comorbidities (diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, uncontrolled arterial hypertension, metabolic syndrome, or obesity) and lifestyle factors.

Notes

Author contributions

Conceptualization: SG, VC. Data curation: SG, VC. Formal analysis: SG, HK, VC. Investigation: SG, VC. Methodology: SG, HSS, VC. Resources: SG. Supervision: SG, HSS. Validation: SG, HK, VC. Visualization: HSS, HK, VC. Writing–original draft: SG, VC. Writing–review & editing: HSS, HK, VC.

Conflict of interest

None.

Funding

None.

Data availability

Contact the corresponding author for data availability.

Acknowledgments

None.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary materials can be found via https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2024.00066.

Supplementary Video 1.

cise-2024-00066-Supplementary-Video-1.mp4

References

1. Nichols AE, Oh I, Loiselle AE. Effects of type II diabetes mellitus on tendon homeostasis and healing. J Orthop Res 2020;38:13–22.

2. Thomas SJ, McDougall C, Brown ID, et al. Prevalence of symptoms and signs of shoulder problems in people with diabetes mellitus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007;16:748–51.

3. Lin TT, Lin CH, Chang CL, Chi CH, Chang ST, Sheu WH. The effect of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and statins on the development of rotator cuff disease: a nationwide, 11-year, longitudinal, population-based follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 2015;43:2126–32.

4. Abboud JA, Kim JS. The effect of hypercholesterolemia on rotator cuff disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:1493–7.

5. Rönnemaa T, Juva K, Kulonen E. Effect of hyperlipidemic rat serum on the synthesis of collagen by chick embryo fibroblasts. Atherosclerosis 1975;21:315–24.

6. Rothman RH, Parke WW. The vascular anatomy of the rotator cuff. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1965;41:176–86.

7. Gumina S, Arceri V, Carbone S, et al. The association between arterial hypertension and rotator cuff tear: the influence on rotator cuff tear sizes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013;22:229–32.

8. Wendelboe AM, Hegmann KT, Gren LH, Alder SC, White GL Jr, Lyon JL. Associations between body-mass index and surgery for rotator cuff tendinitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:743–7.

9. Gumina S, Candela V, Passaretti D, et al. The association between body fat and rotator cuff tear: the influence on rotator cuff tear sizes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014;23:1669–74.

10. Baumgarten KM, Gerlach D, Galatz LM, et al. Cigarette smoking increases the risk for rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:1534–41.

11. Mallon WJ, Misamore G, Snead DS, Denton P. The impact of preoperative smoking habits on the results of rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004;13:129–32.

12. Carbone S, Gumina S, Arceri V, Campagna V, Fagnani C, Postacchini F. The impact of preoperative smoking habit on rotator cuff tear: cigarette smoking influences rotator cuff tear sizes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012;21:56–60.

13. Passaretti D, Candela V, Venditto T, Giannicola G, Gumina S. Association between alcohol consumption and rotator cuff tear. Acta Orthop 2016;87:165–8.

14. Gumina S, Mezzaqui L, Aimino R, et al. Aetiopathogenesis of rotator cuff tear in patients younger than 50 years: medical conditions play a relevant role. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023;59:998.

15. Põldoja E, Rahu M, Kask K, Weyers I, Kolts I. Blood supply of the subacromial bursa and rotator cuff tendons on the bursal side. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017;25:2041–6.

16. Ling SC, Chen CF, Wan RX. A study on the vascular supply of the supraspinatus tendon. Surg Radiol Anat 1990;12:161–5.

17. de la Garza O, Lierse W, Steiner D. Anatomical study of the blood supply in the human shoulder region. Acta Anat (Basel) 1992;145:412–5.

18. Notarnicola A, Fischetti F, Gallone D, et al. Overload and neovascularization of shoulder tendons in volleyball players. BMC Res Notes 2012;5:397.

19. Chansky HA, Iannotti JP. The vascularity of the rotator cuff. Clin Sports Med 1991;10:807–22.

20. Keough N, de Beer T, Uys A, Hohmann E. An anatomical investigation into the blood supply of the proximal humerus: surgical considerations for rotator cuff repair. JSES Open Access 2019;3:320–7.

21. Determe D, Rongières M, Kany J, et al. Anatomic study of the tendinous rotator cuff of the shoulder. Surg Radiol Anat 1996;18:195–200.

22. Lohr JF, Uhthoff HK. The microvascular pattern of the supraspinatus tendon. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;(254):35–8.

23. Brooks CH, Revell WJ, Heatley FW. A quantitative histological study of the vascularity of the rotator cuff tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992;74:151–3.

24. Jobe CM. Gross anatomy of the shoulder. In : Rockwood CA, Matsen FA III, eds. The shoulder WB Saunders; 1990. p. 60–1.

25. Bonnevialle N, Bayle X, Projetti F, Wargny M, Gomez-Brouchet A, Mansat P. Variations of the micro-vascularization of the greater tuberosity in patients with rotator cuff tears. Int Orthop 2015;39:371–6.

26. Snyder SJ. Diagnostic arthroscopy of the shoulder: normal anatomy and variations. In : Snyder SJ, ed. Shoulder arthroscopy 2nd edth ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. p. 26.

27. Ambrosino P, Grassi G, Maniscalco M. Endothelial dysfunction: from a pathophysiological mechanism to a potential therapeutic target. Biomedicines 2021;10:78.

28. Zeiher AM, Drexler H, Wollschläger H, Just H. Modulation of coronary vasomotor tone in humans: progressive endothelial dysfunction with different early stages of coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation 1991;83:391–401.

29. Berenyiova A, Bernatova I, Zemancikova A, et al. Vascular effects of low-dose ACE2 inhibitor MLN-4760-benefit or detriment in essential hypertension. Biomedicines 2021;10:38.

30. Vane JR, Anggård EE, Botting RM. Regulatory functions of the vascular endothelium. N Engl J Med 1990;323:27–36.

31. Tare M, Parkington HC, Coleman HA, Neild TO, Dusting GJ. Hyperpolarization and relaxation of arterial smooth muscle caused by nitric oxide derived from the endothelium. Nature 1990;346:69–71.

32. Félétou M, Vanhoutte PM. Endothelial dysfunction: a multifaceted disorder (The Wiggers Award Lecture). Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006;291:H985–1002.

33. Ambrosino P, Lupoli R, Iervolino S, et al. Clinical assessment of endothelial function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Intern Emerg Med 2017;12:877–85.

34. Rathbun JB, Macnab I. The microvascular pattern of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1970;52:540–53.

35. Wall LB, Keener JD, Brophy RH. Double-row vs single-row rotator cuff repair: a review of the biomechanical evidence. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009;18:933–41.

36. Milano G, Grasso A, Zarelli D, Deriu L, Cillo M, Fabbriciani C. Comparison between single-row and double-row rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008;16:75–80.

37. Kim DH, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE, et al. Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 2006;34:407–14.

38. Meier SW, Meier JD. Rotator cuff repair: the effect of double-row fixation on three-dimensional repair site. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006;15:691–6.

39. Smith CD, Alexander S, Hill AM, et al. A biomechanical comparison of single and double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:2425–31.

40. Khoriati AA, Antonios T, Gulihar A, Singh B. Single vs double row repair in rotator cuff tears: a review and analysis of current evidence. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2019;10:236–40.

41. Lapner P, Henry P, Athwal GS, et al. Treatment of rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022;31:e120–9.

42. Sethi PM, Sheth CD, Pauzenberger L, et al. Macroscopic rotator cuff tendinopathy and histopathology do not predict repair outcomes of rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 2018;46:779–85.

43. Chung SW, Oh JH, Gong HS, Kim JY, Kim SH. Factors affecting rotator cuff healing after arthroscopic repair: osteoporosis as one of the independent risk factors. Am J Sports Med 2011;39:2099–107.

44. Gumina S, Villani C, Arceri V, et al. Rotator cuff degeneration: the role of genetics. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019;101:600–5.

Article information Continued

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Variable	Group I (n=36)	Group II (n=45)	Group III (n=26)
Male:female	19:17	24:21	16:10
Mean age (yr, mean±SD)	57.8±3.6	60.4±3.5	56.3±5.2